Saturday, April 25, 2009

Twitter is such a short blip that at first I wondered how it could be useful to any library, much less mine. However, after looking at some and following GRPL (Grand Rapids Public Library--my daughter is currently in that community), I can see some very positive uses.

For example, a program date changes at the last minute--a twitter post could help get the word out. Or, if the library has a blog on their website, a twitter post could draw attention to any new blog postings. Or, a short tweet can be a reminder of an activity.

Or, this is the most fun--GRPL had this recent post: New blog post: Rats in the Dumpster http://www.grpl.org/blog/?p

Now of course, anyone with any sense of adventure and/or curiosity is going to look at this tweet and wonder about it. Is the library located in a rat infested area? Doesn't the dumpster get emptied frequently? Now, if either of those are the case, I probably wouldn't want to be a patron there, and if I worked there, I certainly wouldn't want to advertise the fact so that my patrons didn't want to come. So, those two possibilities couldn't be true.

So, of course, I want to learn more and I'll click on the link to their blog and get the full, true story, as well as a great photo. And I'll learn that this "incident" created some great PR even though that was not necessarily the intent.

So, can twitter help my library? Yes, but only if I use it often enough for people to be interested in what is there.

P.S. Did you check out the rat story?

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

OPAL and other stuff

I looked at several different archived OPAL selections and found them to be both interesting and frustrating. Each OPAL is different, not just because of content, but also because of the approach taken as well as the functionality of the technology employed. For example, the Author discussion with Debi Gliori held Nov 18, 2005, was audio only. Pictures of her work, etc. would have been very interesting but this was simply the author talking.

The Picturing America Program in Public Libraries, Nov 2008, was much more interesting because slides were included. However, the time delay between the audio and the picture was not good which made it difficult to follow at times. However, since we will have the Picturing America program at our library this summer, I found this OPAL helpful, giving me some ideas as to how I may incorporate it into our other programing.

OPAL is a format that I will try to use in the future--there is a lot of interesting stuff out there. I especially like the archival function since connecting with a specific time is not always practical, as I found with the InfoTrac Learning Lunches.

Just some comments on Skype and Online Chat. I am glad to understand how Skype works. I've heard of grandparents using Skype to stay in touch with grandchildren, especially when many miles apart. Although not necessary at this point in my life, it is worth considering in the future. Online chat makes sense to me only when phoning is not practical or a group discussion is needed. However, it is also hard to follow--did a college freshman parent thing awhile back and found it to be very confusing--too many threads of conversation. So ends Lesson 1.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Communications 2 Point O: Email/Reference

How did we survive before the days of email? I wonder how many other forms of technology will this question be asked of in the near future?

So, how do I use email? Of course, personal use with family members and friends. But at work? Well, other librarians, via direct and list servs; responses regarding on-line book and supply orders; sending news articles to the local newspaper; communicate with teachers about their class visits; some patron requests or info about previous face-to-face conversations; and solicitations from authors, jobbers, etc. So, yes, there is a lot to discard without opening, others to reply to and then delete, and more to file for later reference. All this takes time--I check it first thing and then frequently throughout the day The library uses email for genealogy requests and historical questions, ILL requests, and needed dialogue with the State Library staff. We do notify a few patrons regarding their item holds. Between staff? Occasional messages but intercom or face-to-face is generally more reliable. Has it improved productivity? Yes and no. Takes time, but saved messages can be helpful when a problem occurs with a book order, for example. Being able to track the history can be great. Web 2.0 communication tools for reference can be useful in the right context. At the college level, where the communication volume is high and students use texting and instant messaging a lot, these tools can be useful. In our small library, not so much. We do not have the personnel to be able to dedicate someone to constant online availability for the random contact. Email is great for delayed reference but phone is still the most helpful for immediate needs. I recognize that texting and IM may become more in demand in the future, but at this point? No.

Post Script

I guess I am not very good at reading. Having two different blogs on my dashboard is confusing. I originally posted this on the Lifetime Learners Blog unintentionally and then wondered why there was no new posting to What's Happening. I figured it out, copied and pasted here and deleted the original posting. In the process, I tried saving the post as a draft but then could not find the draft. Where does that go?

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Montana Library 2.0 Challenge--a Year Later

Well, since it has been a year since I posted anything, I'd say that blogging, at least here, is not my thing. I'm not one to put myself "out there" very much.

The best part of participating last year was the exposure to different types of technology--terminology, etc. Now, at least when someone mentions something I have some idea of what they are talking about.

I have found that unless I have a definite reason to use something, I won't spend any time there. For example, I will view things on uTube when sent to me but I don't spend time looking for stuff.

I'm taking the Montana Library 2.0 Challenge again for two reasons--multiple exposure to something new is always good--hopefully I'll absorb something this time that I did not see the first time around. The second reason is that there is always new stuff out there and this is a good way to be exposed.

So, here we go.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Challenge Conclusions





When I began this, I did not think I would get all the way through the challenge but here I am!


I am still mulling what tools I think will be useful to me in the future. I know that wikis serve a purpose as referred to in my previous posting, and possibly a blog. Flickr will be a good source for pictures and tagging can be useful in narrowing a search and tracking my sites of interest, especially if I do any work from home.


Personally, who knows yet what I will use. The best part however, is that I believe I may have learned about some tech tools that my kids may not know about yet! Guess I shouldn't count on that one. At least I am acquainted with the concepts so we can converse in a somewhat reasonable fashion. And, like any new knowledge, I now have a good framework for building from because I know of options.


My biggest frustration is the fact that not all sites are intuitive/user friendly for those with limited experience. Our staff now need to sit down together and explore options and share how-to's. Some were more frustrated than others, I guess depending upon how tech savy each is. Terminology even in the area of instruction does not always make sense. The longer we use stuff, the more we forget what our own learning curve was like and of course, that learning curve may be much steeper for some. I still remember the first time I had to use a mouse--I did not have a clue--and I often forget when working with the public that for some, they are still back there--do not have a clue--about whatever.


Thank you for making this course available. Since it was not linked to a particular time of the day, i.e. no chat or phone, it was a little easier to squeeze into my schedule. There were some days when the only way to do any of it was from home.

To Wiki or Not to Wiki...

Wikis are an interesting phonomena, from huge, like Wikipedia, to very small, collaborative or private. So, how do I think I'll use one?

Well, one library seemed to use theirs for posting all sorts of library info: articles, calendar, etc. A blog could do the same thing but the wiki has the advantage of using multiple pages that are searchable whereas the blog just continues on and on.....

I also liked the subject library wiki that brought together library info and public info by topic. This type should definitely be open to the public as then related activities can be easily added. Definitely, more than one librarian would need to be involved with the maintainance of this type of wiki.

Editing of a wiki is much easier than many web pages and since my library website is not very user friendly, a wiki could be an ideal way to easily add stuff to the web page, via a link, without all the fuss and bother of using a tech. Since it is possible to limit who as access to the editing, this seems like a very useful tool for me.

Actually, I used a wiki last summer to put our summer reading program info on the web. lplsummerreading.pbwiki.com. I have not changed it yet for this year but plan to do so. Since I am generally responsible for the library news articles, I'm still considering which format I would prefer for them, wiki or blog. I think I am leaning towards the wiki--just not making it available for public editing.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Tag, Your It

Wow! It's been awhile since I've been able to work on this.

Looking around del.icio.us is both good and bad. The video makes it seem so simple, and the concepts for pulling together related stuff are great. But when I enter del.icio.us itself (not subscribed, of course) I am overwhelmed. There just seems to be too much stuff.


I can see how tagging my own stuff is helpful. The social part seems more cumbersome but I guess if it is used as a means to expand upon my own tag terms and find similar sites then that is ok. I think being subscribed would help my exploration more too.

I did find it interesting to put in a desired search term--it would be worth experimenting with results that way as compared to google.

I am looking forward to wikki's as I as a little familiar with them so may have a little more foundation to build from.